Not in my name

So the media bottom feeders insist that they only cover the Tiger Woods accident because the "public" demands it.

I guess they are right. Well, right if by "public" you mean the 1 or 2% of Americans who tune into cable news shows. And if by "demand" you mean "will sit through the speculative blather as they wait for news about Afghanistan policy or the health care debate."

Me, I'm a Tiger Woods fan. And contra John Feinstein Tiger doesn't owe me jack.