Mom who killed son may still get alimony
Court rules dad's payments could resume when his ex-wife is released from prison
A father whose ex-wife killed their son in a drunken rage does not have to pay alimony while she is in prison, but may have to resume payments when she gets out, a state appeals court ruled yesterday.
A three-judge Appellate Division panel found there is nothing in the law that would automatically stop alimony payments to a former spouse who killed a child.
Sunday, November 25, 2007
Here's one for "The Law is an Ass" files
Sunday, November 18, 2007
A harrowing account of an honor killing
RTWT
Sins of the father
In a suburban McDonald’s a father begged his wayward daughter to come home... so he and the men of her family could have her beaten, raped and murdered. Fearing violence, but moved by his tears, she relented – and died. Our correspondent investigates how a man can choose the death of a daughter above dishonour
RTWT
Friday, November 16, 2007
Facts don't lie
From Cold Hard Football Facts
From Cold Hard Football Facts
Icy Issue: How come nobody talks about Ben Roethlisberger as an elite NFL quarterback?
Icier Response: Apparently people just can't believe it's possible to be so good so young.
Thursday, November 15, 2007
Another atomic spy is revealed
This one is pretty important:
This one is pretty important:
George Koval also had a secret. During World War II, he was a top Soviet spy, code named Delmar and trained by Stalin’s ruthless bureau of military intelligence.
Atomic spies are old stuff. But historians say Dr. Koval, who died in his 90s last year in Moscow and whose name is just coming to light publicly, was probably one of the most important spies of the 20th century.
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!!!
From Michelle Malkin:
RTWT but it carries a blood pressure alert.
From Michelle Malkin:
The document of the day is a press release from the Justice Department announcing, “Former Employee of CIA and FBI Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy, Unauthorized Computer Access and Naturalization Fraud.” A Lebanese illegal alien was working for the Bush FBI and CIA, got into our computer systems, got access to info about her Lebanese relatives and the terrorist group Hezbollah, arranged a sham marriage (where have we seen that before), and nosed around in bribery and extortion conspiracy probes. Debbie Schlussel, Jihad Watch, and Allah have full coverage of Nada Nadim Prouty’s guilty plea and the appalling security lapses involved.
RTWT but it carries a blood pressure alert.
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Peter King is an idiot
Sports Illustrated actually pays him to write this garbage:
The fat poseur ignores that elephant in the living room. Instead, he spins a grand theory out of locker-room gossip.
He also ignores a highly relevant comparison:
Peyton Manning in four post-season games (2006)
70.8 QB rating
3 Touchdowns
7 Interceptions
Ben Roethlisberger in four post-season games (2005)
101.7 QB rating
7 Touchdowns
3 interceptions
Sports Illustrated actually pays him to write this garbage:
None of those items, however, was the story of the day. Ben Roethlisberger was. When I watched Roethlisberger last year, I thought, "Flawed quarterback.'' When I watched Roethlisberger on Sunday, I thought, "Franchise quarterback.''Gee, i wonder if it occurred to him that Roethlisberger's poor 2006 performance might have something to do with a NEAR FATAL MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT? Think that might be enough to throw him off his game?
I didn't like his lackadaisical decision-making last year, or his declining accuracy, or what I'd heard his teammates say about his work ethic. Maybe it was right, and maybe it wasn't. But Roethlisberger wasn't the most popular guy in his own locker room last year, and he needed a change. He got it.
The fat poseur ignores that elephant in the living room. Instead, he spins a grand theory out of locker-room gossip.
He also ignores a highly relevant comparison:
Peyton Manning in four post-season games (2006)
70.8 QB rating
3 Touchdowns
7 Interceptions
Ben Roethlisberger in four post-season games (2005)
101.7 QB rating
7 Touchdowns
3 interceptions
Thursday, November 08, 2007
Confusing ends and means
Vic Carucci on NFL.com
Why should a team beat their head against a wall. The Ravens sold out to stop the run and left their inexperienced DBs exposed. The Steelers made them pay for that. (Big time).
What, exactly, would be gained by running the ball into the teeth of the defense? The Steelers were already reaping the benefits of a running game.
Vic Carucci on NFL.com
I was as impressed as anyone with the way Ben Roethlisberger moved and threw his way to a franchise-record five touchdowns. But that's what a good quarterback with above-average receivers should do against a team missing both starting cornerbacks. I was as impressed as anyone with the very convincing Jack Lambert imitation that James Harrison gave in the first half. But that's part of what the league's top-ranked defense should do against an offense, and especially a quarterback, that can't out of its own way. What troubled me was seeing the Steelers' No. 2-ranked rushing attack struggle to move the ball on the ground, even if it didn't have to.
Why should a team beat their head against a wall. The Ravens sold out to stop the run and left their inexperienced DBs exposed. The Steelers made them pay for that. (Big time).
What, exactly, would be gained by running the ball into the teeth of the defense? The Steelers were already reaping the benefits of a running game.
Friday, November 02, 2007
Thursday, November 01, 2007
Failing upward
Editor Melanie Sill is leaving the Raleigh News and Observer
Of course, the PR flacks and internal spin-meisters want to put the best face on it:
Previous high-profile scandals (Janet Cooke, Jayson Blair) involved individual malfeasance and slipshod editorial oversight. The Washington Post and New York Times also deserve credit for how they handled their screw-ups. When questions arose about their stories, the bosses investigated, took action, and told the public what went wrong.
Contrast that with how the N&O handled the lacrosse case. Their attacks on the players was not the work of a single rogue reporters. The editors pushed the story hard and flooded the zone to trash the team. In short, the paper failed to get the story right when they were trying very hard to get the story.
What really hurts the N&O is not that they made mistakes. Rather, it is their obstinate refusal to acknowledge those mistakes. Unlike the Times and the Post, they have refused to give a full explanation of what went wrong and how they intend to prevent future errors.
It is understandable that a young reporter got conned by a sob story. It is embarrassing that her editors bought the same story that ignited the firestorm. It is ludicrous that the paper still defends their early reporting and tries to shift the blame to “national media.”
OTOH, it paid off for Sill who gets a nice promotion and a ticket out of Raleigh.
Two other points:
We see again how “public editors” work mainly as PR flacks for their paper:
Also, this is worth a laugh to those who followed Sill’s blog and her testy relationship with internet readers:
Editor Melanie Sill is leaving the Raleigh News and Observer
Melanie Sill is named The Bee's new top editor
Of course, the PR flacks and internal spin-meisters want to put the best face on it:
Sill was in the thick of one of the most explosive stories to hit North Carolina in recent years, the accusations of rape against a group of Duke University lacrosse players.
After the players were eventually exonerated, the national media were roundly criticized for taking the rape allegations at face value.That may be how it looks inside the media bubble. For those of us who followed the case, The N&O’s performance was abysmal on many, many levels. In fact, I’d argue that the paper’s performance won it the coveted title of “most embarrassing screw up in the annals of daily journalism.”
Previous high-profile scandals (Janet Cooke, Jayson Blair) involved individual malfeasance and slipshod editorial oversight. The Washington Post and New York Times also deserve credit for how they handled their screw-ups. When questions arose about their stories, the bosses investigated, took action, and told the public what went wrong.
Contrast that with how the N&O handled the lacrosse case. Their attacks on the players was not the work of a single rogue reporters. The editors pushed the story hard and flooded the zone to trash the team. In short, the paper failed to get the story right when they were trying very hard to get the story.
What really hurts the N&O is not that they made mistakes. Rather, it is their obstinate refusal to acknowledge those mistakes. Unlike the Times and the Post, they have refused to give a full explanation of what went wrong and how they intend to prevent future errors.
It is understandable that a young reporter got conned by a sob story. It is embarrassing that her editors bought the same story that ignited the firestorm. It is ludicrous that the paper still defends their early reporting and tries to shift the blame to “national media.”
OTOH, it paid off for Sill who gets a nice promotion and a ticket out of Raleigh.
Two other points:
We see again how “public editors” work mainly as PR flacks for their paper:
The News & Observer's public editor said the paper did a far better job than most of digging beneath the surface but committed some "serious missteps" in the first few weeks, including making references to the accuser as "a victim."Once again, they praise themselves with faint damns.
Also, this is worth a laugh to those who followed Sill’s blog and her testy relationship with internet readers:
Hailed as a risk taker who will push the newspaper further into the Internet age
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)